§Handling data streams reactively
Progressive Stream Processing and manipulation is an important task in modern Web Programming, starting from chunked upload/download to Live Data Streams consumption, creation, composition and publishing through different technologies including Comet and WebSockets.
Iteratees provide a paradigm and an api allowing this manipulation while focusing on several important aspects:
- Allowing user to create, consume and transform streams of data.
- Treating different data sources in the same manner (Files on disk, Websockets, Chunked Http, Data Upload, …).
- Composable: use a rich set of adapters and transformers to change the shape of the source or the consumer; construct your own or start with primitives.
- Having control over when it is enough data sent and be informed when source is done sending data.
- Non blocking, reactive and allowing control over resource consumption (Thread, Memory)
§Iteratees
An Iteratee is a consumer, it describes the way input will be consumed to produce some value. Iteratee is a consumer that returns a value it computes after being fed enough input.
// an iteratee that consumes chunkes of String and produces an Int
Iteratee[String,Int]
The Iteratee interface Iteratee[E,A]
takes two type parameters, E
representing the type of the Input it accepts and A
the type of the calculated result.
An iteratee has one of three states, Cont
meaning accepting more input, Error
to indicate an error state and Done
which carries the calculated result. These three states are defined by the fold
method of an Iteratee[E,A]
interface:
def fold[B](folder: Step[E, A] => Future[B]): Future[B]
where Step
object has 3 states :
object Step {
case class Done[+A, E](a: A, remaining: Input[E]) extends Step[E, A]
case class Cont[E, +A](k: Input[E] => Iteratee[E, A]) extends Step[E, A]
case class Error[E](msg: String, input: Input[E]) extends Step[E, Nothing]
}
The fold method defines an iteratee as one of the three mentioned states. It accepts three callback functions and will call the appropriate one depending on its state to eventually extract a required value. When calling fold
on an iteratee you are basically saying:
- If the iteratee is the state
Done
, then I’d take the calculated result of typeA
and what is left from the last consumed chunk of inputInput[E]
and eventually produce aB
- If the iteratee is the state
Cont
, then I’d take the provided continuation (which is accepting an input)Input[E] => Iteratee[E,A]
and eventually produce aB
. Note that this state provides the only way to push input into the iteratee, and get a new iteratee state, using the provided continuation function. - If the iteratee is the state
Error
, then I’d take the error message of typeString
and the input that caused it and eventually produce a B.
Obviously, depending on the state of the iteratee, fold
will produce the appropriate B
using the corresponding passed function.
To sum up, iteratee consists of 3 states, and fold
provides the means to do something useful with the state of the iteratee.
§Some important types in the Iteratee
definition:
Before providing some concrete examples of iteratees, let’s clarify two important types we mentioned above:
-
Input[E]
represents a chunk of input that can be either anEl[E]
containing some actual input, anEmpty
chunk or anEOF
representing the end of the stream.
For example,Input[String]
can beEl("Hello!")
, Empty, or EOF -
Promise[A]
represents, as its name tells, a promise of value of typeA
. This means that it will eventually be redeemed with a value of typeA
and you can schedule a callback, among other things you can do, if you are interested in that value. A promise is a very nice primitive for synchronization and composing async calls, and is explained further at the PromiseScala section.
§Some primitive iteratees:
By implementing the iteratee, and more specifically its fold method, we can now create some primitive iteratees that we can use later on.
- An iteratee in the
Done
state producing an1:Int
and returningEmpty
as left from lastInput[String]
val doneIteratee = new Iteratee[String,Int] {
def fold[B](folder: Step[String,Int] => Future[B]): Future[B] = folder(Step.Done(1, Input.Empty))
}
As shown above, this is easily done by calling the appropriate callback function, in our case done
, with the necessary information.
To use this iteratee we will make use of the Future
that holds a promised value.
def folder(step: Step[String,Int]):Future[Option[Int]] = step match {
case Step.Done(a, e) => future(Some(a))
case Step.Cont(k) => future(None)
case Step.Error(msg,e) => future(None)
}
val eventuallyMaybeResult: Future[Option[Int]] = doneIteratee.fold(folder)
eventuallyMaybeResult.onComplete(i => println(i))
of course to see what is inside the Future
when it is redeemed we use onComplete
// will eventually print 1
eventuallyMaybeResult.onComplete(i => println(i))
There is already a built-in way allowing us to create an iteratee in the Done
state by providing a result and input, generalizing what is implemented above:
val doneIteratee = Done[String,Int](1, Input.Empty)
Creating a Done
iteratee is simple, and sometimes useful, but it obviously does not consume any input. Let’s create an iteratee that consumes one chunk and eventually returns it as the computed result:
val consumeOneInputAndEventuallyReturnIt = new Iteratee[String,Int] {
def fold[B](folder: Step[String,Int] => Future[B]): Future[B] = {
folder(Step.Cont {
case Input.EOF => Done(0, Input.EOF) //Assuming 0 for default value
case Input.Empty => this
case Input.El(e) => Done(e.toInt,Input.EOF)
})
}
}
def folder(step: Step[String,Int]):Future[Int] = step match {
case Step.Done(a, _) => future(a)
case Step.Cont(k) => k(Input.EOF).fold({
case Step.Done(a1, _) => Future.successful(a1)
case _ => throw new Exception("Erroneous or diverging iteratee")
})
case _ => throw new Exception("Erroneous iteratee")
}
As for Done
there is a built-in way to define an iteratee in the Cont
state by providing a function that takes Input[E]
and returns a state of Iteratee[E,A]
:
val consumeOneInputAndEventuallyReturnIt = {
Cont[String,Int](in => Done(100,Input.Empty))
}
In the same manner there is a built-in way to create an iteratee in the Error
state by providing and error message and an Input[E]
Back to the consumeOneInputAndEventuallyReturnIt
, it is possible to create a two step simple iteratee manually but it becomes harder and cumbersome to create any real world iteratee capable of consuming a lot of chunks before, possibly conditionally, it eventually returns a result. Luckily there are some built-in methods to create common iteratee shapes in the Iteratee
object.
§Folding input:
One common task when using iteratees is maintaining some state and altering it each time input is pushed. This type of iteratee can be easily created using the Iteratee.fold
which has the signature:
def fold[E, A](state: A)(f: (A, E) => A): Iteratee[E, A]
Reading the signature one can realize that this fold takes an initial state A
, a function that takes the state and an input chunk (A, E) => A
and returning an Iteratee[E,A]
capable of consuming E
s and eventually returning an A
. The created iteratee will return Done
with the computed A
when an input EOF
is pushed.
One example can be creating an iteratee that counts the number of bytes pushed in:
val inputLength: Iteratee[Array[Byte],Int] = {
Iteratee.fold[Array[Byte],Int](0) { (length, bytes) => length + bytes.size }
}
Another could be consuming all input and eventually returning it:
val consume: Iteratee[String,String] = {
Iteratee.fold[String,String]("") { (result, chunk) => result ++ chunk }
}
There is actually already a method in Iteratee
object that does exactly this for any scala TraversableLike
called consume
, so our example becomes:
val consume = Iteratee.consume[String]()
One common case is to create an iteratee that does some imperative operation for each chunk of input:
val printlnIteratee = Iteratee.foreach[String](s => println(s))
More interesting methods exist like repeat
, ignore
and fold1
which is different from the preceeding fold
in offering the opportunity to be asynchronous in treating input chunks.
Of course one should be worried now about how hard would it be to manually push input into an iteratee by folding over iteratee states over and over again. Indeed each time one has to push input into an iteratee, one has to use the fold
function to check on its state, if it is a Cont
then push the input and get the new state or otherwise return the computed result. That’s when Enumerator
s come in handy.
Next: Enumerators