JPA persistence
Play provides a set of very useful helpers to simplify the management of your JPA entities.
Note that you can still go back to the plain JPA API whenever you want.
Starting the JPA entity manager
Play will automatically start the Hibernate entity manager when it finds one or more classes annotated with the @javax.persistence.Entity annotation. However, make sure that you have correctly configured a JDBC datasource or it will fail.
Obtaining the JPA entity manager
When the JPA entity manager is started you can get it from the application code, using the JPA helper. For example:
public static index() {
Query query = JPA.em().createQuery("select * from Article");
List<Article> articles = query.getResultList();
render(articles);
}
Transaction management
Play will automatically manage transactions for you. It will start a transaction for each HTTP request and commit it when the HTTP response is sent. If your code throws an exception, the transaction will automatically rollback.
If you need to force transaction rollback from the application code, you can use the JPA.setRollbackOnly() method.
You can also use annotations to specify how transactions should be handled.
If you annotated the method in the controller with @play.db.jpa.Transactional(readOnly=true), then the transaction will be read-only.
If you want to prevent Play from starting a transaction at all, you can annotated the method with @play.db.jpa.NoTransaction.
To prevent transactions for all methods, you can annotate the Controller-class with @play.db.jpa.NoTransaction.
When using @play.db.jpa.NoTransaction, Play does not get a connection from the connection pool at all – which improves speed.
The play.db.jpa.Model support class
This is the main helper class for JPA. If you make one of your JPA entities extend the play.db.jpa.Model class, it will give you a lot of helper methods to simplify the JPA access.
For example, look at this Post model object:
@Entity
public class Post extends Model {
public String title;
public String content;
public Date postDate; @ManyToOne
public Author author; @OneToMany
public ListThe play.db.jpa.Model class automatically provides an autogenerated Long id field. We think that it’s generally a good idea to keep an auto-generated Long id as primary key for JPA models (the technical primary key) and manage your functional primary key using another field.
Note that we have used the fact that Play automatically considers the Post class’ public members as properties. So we don’t need to write all setter/getter methods for this object.
Custom id mapping with GenericModel
Nothing forces you to base your entities on play.db.jpa.Model. Your JPA entities can also extend the play.db.jpa.GenericModel class. This is required if you do not want to use a Long id as the primary key for your entity.
For example, here is a mapping for a very simple User entity. The id is a UUID, the name and mail properties are required, and we use Play Validation to enforce simple business rules.
@Entity
public class User extends GenericModel {
@Id
@GeneratedValue(generator = "system-uuid")
@GenericGenerator(name = "system-uuid", strategy = "uuid")
public String id;
@Required
public String name; @Required
@MaxSize(value=255, message = “email.maxsize”)
@play.data.validation.Email
public String mail;
}Finding objects
The play.db.jpa.Model gives you several ways to find data. For example:
Find by ID
The simplest way to find an object.
Post aPost = Post.findById(5L);
Find all
List<Post> posts = Post.findAll();
This is the simplest way to retrieve all posts, but you can do the same using:
List<Post> posts = Post.all().fetch();
This allows you to paginate results:
List<Post> posts = Post.all().fetch(100); // 100 max posts
or even,
List<Post> posts = Post.all().from(50).fetch(100); // 100 max posts start at 50
Find using a simplified query
That allows you to create very expressive finders, but will only work for simple queries.
Post.find("byTitle", "My first post").fetch();
Post.find("byTitleLike", "%hello%").fetch();
Post.find("byAuthorIsNull").fetch();
Post.find("byTitleLikeAndAuthor", "%hello%", connectedUser).fetch();
Simple queries follow the following syntax “[Property][Comparator]And?” where Comparator can be the following:
- LessThan – less than the given value
- LessThanEquals – less than or equal a give value
- GreaterThan – greater than a given value
- GreaterThanEquals – greater than or equal a given value
- Like – Equivalent to a SQL like expression, except that the property will always convert to lower case.
- Ilike – Similar to a Like, except case insensitive, meaning that your argument will convert to lower case too.
- Elike – Equivalent to a SQL like expression, no conversion.
- NotEqual – Negates equality
- Between – Between two values (requires two arguments)
- IsNotNull – Not a null value (doesn’t require an argument)
- IsNull – Is a null value (doesn’t require an argument)
Find using a JPQL query
You can use a JPQL query:
Post.find(
"select p from Post p, Comment c where c.post = p and c.subject like ?", "%hop%"
);
or even a part of:
Post.find("title", "My first post").fetch();
Post.find("title like ?", "%hello%").fetch();
Post.find("author is null").fetch();
Post.find("title like % and author is null", "%hello%").fetch();
Post.find("title like % and author is null order by postDate", "%hello%").fetch();
You can even specify only the order by statement:
Post.find("order by postDate desc").fetch();
Counting objects
You can easily count objects.
long postCount = Post.count();
Or even count using a query:
long userPostCount = Post.count("author = ?", connectedUser);
Explicit save
Hibernate maintains a cache of Objects that have been queried from the database. These Objects are referred to as persistent Objects as long as the EntityManager that was used to fetch them is still active. That means that any changes to these Objects within the bounds of a transaction are automatically persisted when the transaction is committed. In standard JPA, these updates are implicit within the transaction’s boundary; you don’t have to explicitly call any method to persist the values.
The main downside is that we must manage all of our Objects manually. Instead of telling the EntityManager to update an Object (which would be far more intuitive), we must tell the EntityManager which Objects NOT to update. We do this by calling refresh(), which essentially rolls back a single entity. We do this just prior to calling commit on the transaction or when we realise the Object shouldn’t be updated.
Here is a common use case, when editing a persistent object after a form submit:
public static void save(Long id) {
User user = User.findById(id);
user.edit("user", params.all());
validation.valid(user);
if(validation.hasErrors()) {
// Here we have to explicitly discard the user modifications...
user.refresh();
edit(id);
}
show(id);
}
From what I’ve seen, most developers are not aware of this, and forget to discard the object state in case of errors, assuming that the object will not be saved without an explicit call to save().
So that’s exactly what we’ve changed in Play. All the persistent objects extending the JPASupport/JPAModel will not be saved without an explicit call to the save() method. So you can actually rewrite the previous code as:
public static void save(Long id) {
User user = User.findById(id);
user.edit("user", params.all());
validation.valid(user);
if(validation.hasErrors()) {
edit(id);
} else{
user.save(); // explicit save here
show(id);
}
}
This is far more intuitive. Moreover since it could be tedious to explicitly call save() on a large object graph, the save() call is automatically cascaded to the relationships annotated with the cascade=CascadeType.ALL attribute.
More about generic typing problems
The play.db.jpa.Model defines a set of generic methods. These generic methods use a type parameter to specify the method’s return type. When using those methods, the concrete type to be used as return value is derived from the invocation context using type inference.
For example, the findAll method is defined as:
<T> List<T> findAll();
And you use it as:
List<Post> posts = Post.findAll();
Here the Java compiler resolves the actual type of T using the fact that you assign the method result to a List<Post>. So T is resolved as a Post type.
Unfortunately, this doesn’t work if the generic method’s return value is directly used as a parameter for another method invocation or used in a loop. So the following code fails with a compiler error saying “Type mismatch: cannot convert from element type Object to Post”:
for(Post p : Post.findAll()) {
p.delete();
}
Of course you can resolve this issue using a temporary local variable, as:
List<Post> posts = Post.findAll(); // type inference works here!
for(Post p : posts) {
p.delete();
}
But wait, there is a better way. You can use a practical but somewhat unknown Java language feature, which makes the code shorter while more readable at the same time:
for(Post p : Post.<Post>findAll()) {
p.delete();
}
Continuing the discussion
Now we’ll check some Play libraries.